Showing posts with label Manheim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manheim. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

The Current State of Leasing and Residual Based Financing

Ruggles, February 2015

According to the most recent Manheim Market Report, “Lease originations exceeded 3.5 million for the first time since 1999. It will take only a slight increase in 2015 to push new leases above the all-time high reached in 1999.” This is largely the result of Auto OEMs attempting to counteract the negative impact of long term financing, which is also reaching new highs. Both initiatives are efforts by the OEMs to maintain volume and production in the face of rising MSRPs and transaction prices. Increasing finance terms take consumers out of the market for extended periods of time and dramatically decreases the chance the consumer will return to the same dealer and/or manufacturer for their next vehicle.

The new vehicle market is increasingly skewed to high income households. This increases the importance of the late model pre-owned vehicle market. The pre-owned market is currently running at a 42 million unit rate. Compared to selling rates from the depths of the Great Recession, new vehicle volume is up by 42%. Preowned selling rates only dropped by around 20% at the height of the Recession, showing considerably less volatility than the new vehicle market. Despite dramatic volatility in certain segments caused by sudden spikes in fuel prices, the absolute change in residual values over the last 19 years is 3.5% as measured by the Manheim Index. That fuel price volatility has proven to be temporary as consumers adjust to higher fuel prices in a few months. According to Tom Webb, Manheim’s Chief Economist, the change residual values in the last three years has only been 2%. That’s stability.

Is there any real danger in the recent dramatic lease percentages? Most experts agree there is absolutely no danger and considerable upside. There is still considerable pent up demand in both the new and pre-owned markets. Less affluent households, and those consumers who are interested in the greatest value, gravitate to the pre-owned side as evidenced by the explosion in Certified Pre-Owned numbers, which set new records every month. Increased new vehicle short term leasing and/or residual based financing is required to provide the inventory to fuel these increases.

There are many who regard pre-owned vehicle leasing, especially in the CPO area, as the greatest untapped area of opportunity in the auto retail business. There are some who claim the residual based payments on pre-owned aren’t enough less than subventions on new vehicles to justify a consumer to go with the pre-owned. A careful study of this theory shows that is the exception, not the rule. There are many credit unions and other lenders around the country offering residual based programs that dramatically reduces the monthly payment while still shortening the term. The truth is, dealers who are not offering their customers such a program probably aren’t aware of their existence or are held hostage by their own pay plans, which incentive F&I departments to continue to extend term while adding in rate participation. This is short term thinking at its worst. Dealers need to wake up and recognize that this short term “gain” carries with it long term penalties. Scot Hall, Executive Vice President of Swapalease.com, a leading auto lease facilitator is a big proponent of leasing/residual based financing on pre-owned. He says, “Those cars are generally going to be serviced to a high degree and reconditioned to a high degree, so setting up, say, a short three-year lease on those — or maybe even a two-year lease on some of those cars — I don’t think there would be a lot of risk, if it’s done correctly. I think it would benefit the consumer, and especially as more and more leases are coming back off the new end, this would be another avenue to help dealers and manufacturers move those off-lease vehicles from a remarketing perspective.”

For credit unions and other lenders offering a pre-owned residual based program, their yield is considerably higher due to the higher daily balances. This is particularly important in today’s margin compressed environment. Further, there is really no competition allowing for somewhat higher interest rates to be charged while still maintaining the short term low payment objective. They get their borrower back more often while both dealer and lender achieve the objective of retaining the consumer and doing business with them more often.

So what is the future of auto retail? Longer terms with lower volume or shorter terms, higher sales, more pedigreed pre-owned inventory for dealers, more customer loyalty, and ultimately higher profits? After all, it is more expensive to find a new customer than to retain the ones you already have.

Monday, June 9, 2014

Auto Auctions, Japanese Style

Here're just a few notes on a visit to the Kinki branch of Toyota Auto Auction on a day when they were offering 1,700 vehicles (of which 10% or so might not hit the reserve price). This was arranged by Prof. Shioji of Kyoto University who helped host the first meeting in Japan of GERPISA, an international consortium of (mainly social science) researchers on the global auto industry. Now I've yet to see a Manheim or an Adesa auction so I can't compare and contrast. Perhaps later this summer I can rectify that...

At the Kinki site there's a massive multi-floor garage; land's too valuable close to Osaka for a massive open-air parking lot. We watched one of their evaluators go through a vehicle with a long checklist, from spots of corrosion to paint that suggests a repaired ding, including pulling away the fascia in a couple places. Most purchasers don't look at the actual vehicle but rely instead on the (target) 7 minutes that an inspector spends on a car.

Indeed, when we moved inside it was apparent that many purchasers are remote. While there is a large room of people bidding, many others are at computer screens elsewhere, while those at the Kinki site are watching simultaneous auctions held at other TAA sites. For that matter, Kinki TAA itself runs two lanes simultaneously; each computer in their bidding room has a red button on the left, a blue on the right. So first the screen updates as pre-bids are sorted out, and then the live bidding begins as those sitting in the auditorium or elsewhere click the bid ¥1,000 higher. The screen changes color once the reserve is hit – most of the cars are from trade-ins at Toyota dealers – and sellers can negotiate with the highest bidder when the reserve isn't hit. (I will check my notes later, but recall the no-sale rate is about 10% or, to put it the other way, the conversion rate is 90%.)

Now several larger trends in the Japanese market and in used cars showed up in our discussions. One is the role of cars as durable goods. Japan raised its consumption tax from 5% to 8% on April 1st and given that processing paperwork for a new car purchase takes several days (you have to file proof of a parking spot, which must be vetted by the relevant local government), sales plummeted in late March and are only now starting to recover. The result was a short-run dearth of vehicles coming to auction, and a modest bump in prices. Now at one time cars were kept but a few years, typically being scrapped before vehicle inspections became annual in year 10. That in turn meant low prices for used cars in year 8 ... so the prospect of even a minor repair could lead to a vehicle being scrapped. However, in the early 1990s the vehicle inspection system was relaxed, with less frequent inspections, fewer mandatory parts replacements (reflecting the abominable quality of Japanese cars in the 1960s, brake lines were one mandatory item), and allowing non-dealers to do the inspections. As a result the average age of vehicles is higher, and with a more vigorous resale market, well, that's when TAA switched from a way for Toyota to help dealers by buying trade-ins at an artificially high price as a quiet, off-books subsidy to a real entity. Of course the fact that one friend drives a 13-year-old vehicle that he's in no hurry to replace is not necessarily good news for those selling new cars. Even so, the market remains thin at older ages, where roughly one-third of cars are bought by foreign traders (many in evidence at TAA that day) for export to Russia, Pakistan and West Africa.

The group also visited a shredding operation; more on that later. The key link to TAA is that their business is down by about 50% as vehicles are on the road longer and more are exported (including some apparently exported to be scrapped). As noted in earlier posts on this blog (The Decline of the Japanese Auto Industry), it's going to be really interesting to see how all of the loss of a large domestic market interacts with the product mix of Japanese car companies and particularly the survival of Japanese parts makers.